Talk to an Expert

Foundations

Willingness to pay, and why surveys mislead

5 min on the light depth

The frame

Willingness to pay is the most a buyer would pay before walking away. Nobody can observe it directly, so the common move is to ask, through a survey or a choice exercise built on described prices. What comes back is a stated preference, what a person says they would do when nothing is at stake. Peer-reviewed field experiments find that stated number runs above what the same buyers pay once money is real, a gap known as hypothetical bias. Software widens the gap. The product is experienced before it can be valued, the buyer is a committee, and the single price the survey asks about appears on no contract. The price paid is negotiated below the list.

This matters to you because the first offer made to a leader newly handed pricing is usually a survey. It is fast, quantitative, and gives the room a chart. The number it yields can set a price list that discounting then rewrites deal by deal. Software companies read willingness to pay in the record they already hold: which customers bought, which walked, and the realized price each paid, meaning the price after every discount and concession. That record is the ground this path works from.

The first lays out the peer-reviewed evidence for why these surveys overstate, miss value buyers have never experienced, and go stale. The second argues that value-based pricing emerges from the pricing architecture, the three decisions of licensing, packaging and pricing made together, and that no survey laid on top can substitute for it. The third takes the most recommended survey apart break by break and names what it is still good for.

When a willingness-to-pay number reaches your desk, can you say whether it came from what buyers said or from what they paid?

Three things to say in the room this week

  • A survey tells us what buyers can imagine paying; our closed deals tell us what they paid.
  • Before we commission any pricing research, I want to see our own deal record: who bought, at what realized price.
  • Value-based pricing comes from how we license, package and price, so a survey number alone cannot deliver it.

Core reading

Go deeper: the heavy depth

Read the core in this order.

  • Why willingness-to-pay surveys fail B2B software companies: the evidence base, from the inventor’s own warning about the survey to the field experiments on stated against paid, and why software widens each gap.
  • Value-based pricing strategy: what value-based pricing requires, why it is a property of the pricing architecture and how the principle becomes an operating system.
  • Van Westendorp in B2B: the most recommended pricing survey taken apart at each structural break, and the quick directional read it still gives.

Then the shelf, in any order.

  • Willingness to pay, it’s more complicated: the earliest statement of the frame, software as an experienced good the buyer cannot value beforehand.
  • Price perception in B2B: why consumer price psychology dissolves under committee buying and procurement, and what shapes perception in software deals.
  • Ninety percent of value-based pricing is a hoax: the original argument that consumer techniques fail in B2B and that a sales team cannot sell on value while discounting heavily.
  • Pricing to value: the slogan against the operating discipline, the three decisions made together and validated against real deals.
  • Why value-based pricing is an emergent phenomenon: the conditions a company must hold at once before it appears at all.
  • Price elasticity in B2B software: why a demand curve fitted to negotiated deals measures your own discounting, and what a pricing surface is.
  • Why ROI calculators fail: the companion failure on the selling side, where a single savings number becomes the buyer’s ceiling and the negotiating floor.

Glossary pages to open: willingness to pay, the Van Westendorp price sensitivity meter, and hypothetical bias.

Next on the spine: the pricing architecture itself, the three decisions and the order they depend on each other.

The shelf

Terms

Which depth did you take?